
Hungary’s unofficial ambassador to the IMF,Tamás Fellegi, is reportedly facing a “terrible atmosphere” after his arrival in Washington on an exploratory mission whose objective is to open up communication about a new financial lifeline for the country. Frankly, given the recent record of relations between the two institutions involved it isn’t hard to understand why. Leaving aside the long list of recent grievances, it was Hungary who decided to walk away from the IMF in the first place, suggesting it could manage quite well on its own, thank you very much, so the Washington based lender is now hardly likely to welcome the country back as some sort of long lost prodigal son.
To make matters worse, the country has now opened up a second front by generating a serious dispute with the EU Commission, and other European institutions like the ECB, so it is only to be expected that the Fund will not reach any sort of agreement with the Hungarian government, until after the path has been cleared at the Brussel’s level. Indeed such is the degree of dishumour of Europe’s leaders with the present government, that it is still not clear whether the price for any form of aid might not be Orban’s own head, and the installation of a more technocratic caretaker government. There are, after all, recent precedents for such a development in Greece and Hungary, and indeed the former Hungarian prime minister Ferenc Gyurcsány was effectively forced out by Brussels in March 2009.




julianteakle wrote:In my opinion Europe lose control on Euro situation. Soon Euro will collapses and the dollar will be in the lead position again. People should save their money in dollars nowadays but much more better in gold.


Yields on Germany’s benchmark 10-year Bund, viewed as the euro zone’s safest debt, hit a record low of 1.628 per cent. The previous record was established in November 2011, at the height of the debt crisis before the ECB injected around €1-trillion of cheap three-year funds into the banking system.
[...]
Spanish 10-year yields rose 16 basis points at 6.15 per cent, five-year yields topped 5 per cent, while two-year yields spiked to 3.70 per cent, all 2012 highs.
Six per cent is psychologically important for markets as the pace at which yields rise has accelerated on previous occasions when that level was broken. Beyond 7 per cent, Greece, Portugal and Ireland struggled to raise cash in the market and were forced to seek financial aid.
Underlining investor fears, the cost of insuring Spanish debt against default hit a record high of $520,000 a year to buy $10-million of protection.
Contagion fears pushed Italian 10-year yields about 12 bps higher on the day at 5.66 per cent.


Taggart wrote:Worried about Europe; should I pull out of the market?

like_to_retire wrote:
Myself, I sold all my US stock in 2008, and did the same for Europe in 2009 and put the money to work in Canada. Have had nothing but Canadian securities ever since. One of my better moves.
ltr

Taggart wrote:"For all the talk about our country’s strong banks and coveted natural resources, investors might be surprised to learn that Canada has lately had one of the worst-performing stock markets. At press time, the S&P/TSX Composite Index had fallen 13% over the last 12 months, while U.S. stocks had gained 4%. So far in 2012, even Europe is kicking sand in our faces."

AltaRed wrote:Taggart wrote:"For all the talk about our country’s strong banks and coveted natural resources, investors might be surprised to learn that Canada has lately had one of the worst-performing stock markets. At press time, the S&P/TSX Composite Index had fallen 13% over the last 12 months, while U.S. stocks had gained 4%. So far in 2012, even Europe is kicking sand in our faces."
Which is why one should be diversified across sectors and geographic regions, and stick with the plan. I find it amusing when one "writes off" a region based on a few years of performance.

AltaRed wrote:Which is why one should be diversified across sectors and geographic regions, and stick with the plan. I find it amusing when one "writes off" a region based on a few years of performance.

like_to_retire wrote:So far, I'm way ahead. I'll put myself down as a contrarian, or maybe just dumb.![]()

AltaRed wrote:like_to_retire wrote:So far, I'm way ahead. I'll put myself down as a contrarian, or maybe just dumb.![]()
Maybe just lucky for the window of investing time you have been in.

like_to_retire wrote:When I dumped my USA investments in 2008, I had done a ten year analysis and found I hadn't made a cent. I pontificated on the next ten years and decided that given the huge debt in the USA, I wasn't likely to do much better. Since I was now retired and an income investor, investments in dividend producing stocks in Canada, where I understand the market much better, and where I receive a large bonus in the form of the dividend tax credit, that I predicted I would do much better. The same held true for European investments.
So far, I'm way ahead. I'll put myself down as a contrarian, or maybe just dumb.![]()
ltr

like_to_retire wrote: Since I was now retired and an income investor, investments in dividend producing stocks in Canada, where I understand the market much better, and where I receive a large bonus in the form of the dividend tax credit, that I predicted I would do much better.
ltr

Scomac wrote:Are you sure about being way ahead?



zinfit wrote:The most recent EU summit has just turned the hour glass. I wonder how many summits have been held over the European debt crisis?/


Return to Financial News, Policy and Economics
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest