




northbeach wrote:Apparently, the value of the insurance for the house will be greater than the value of the house, since if the house, burns down, things have to be cleared up before a new house is erected.

Pickles wrote:northbeach wrote:Apparently, the value of the insurance for the house will be greater than the value of the house, since if the house, burns down, things have to be cleared up before a new house is erected.
That sounds odd if you are saying that you are insured for more than the purchase price of your property. Your purchase bought land and a building. Only the building needs to be insured. Do you live in an area where land is so cheap that buying a house costs the same as buying a condo?


Pickles wrote:northbeach wrote:Apparently, the value of the insurance for the house will be greater than the value of the house, since if the house, burns down, things have to be cleared up before a new house is erected.
That sounds odd if you are saying that you are insured for more than the purchase price of your property. Your purchase bought land and a building. Only the building needs to be insured. Do you live in an area where land is so cheap that buying a house costs the same as buying a condo?


deaddog wrote:As I mentioned up thread I am now paying $2.50 for $1000 of Home insurance.
I'm in north central BC, in town with a hydrant within 1000 ft. Electric heat.
Am I being shafted?![]()
What is everyone else paying?




Looking for a better deal on home insurance? Good luck
All insurers are raising rates. That bloated renewal rate is their very best offer. It's the high level of claims
...
You probably know yourself how this tune goes: Bad weather and rising costs cut into our profits. So we're charging you more, from your foundation to your soffits .
Inflation has averaged just under 2 per cent over the past five years, but the average annual increase in our home insurance bill was 10.2 per cent. I live in a four-bedroom home in the suburbs of Ottawa with my wife, two boys, a dog and cat. We think it's a pretty nice house, but the Taj Mahal it's not.
The problem isn't just that my insurer is raising its rates. It's that all companies are doing it to one extent or another, and it's near impossible to find a better deal.
...

AltaRed wrote:I am paying $582 for a 1300 sq. ft. bungalow villa (plus fully developed basement) in Calgary within 1000 ft of a fire hydrant (the policy is called the $1,000,000 solution) plus liability insurance for a significant piece of undeveloped land in the mountains. I don't have time at the moment to dig through what the "milliion dollar solution" all covers.


deaddog wrote:It looks like my insurance rate increased 48% this year.
Last year the cost per $1000 was $1.68
This year the cost per $1000 is $2.50
On top of this the value of the home the insurance company computes increased by an additional 14%
All told my increase totals 70%


we should be able to insure for an agreed value. I would insure for $300k rebuilding cost. If it costs more, so be it. But we would probably just sell the land and collect the $300k and have $500-600k to buy another place

Pickles wrote:I pay Johnson Insurers a total of $632 for $246,000 rebuilding costs (our modest city 1 1/2 storey home is about 1000 sq ft), $210,000 personal possession, $2 million liability and sewer backup. I had to claim on the sewer backup last year and was pleasantly surprised that the $500 deductible was waived. My coverage is up 17% and premium is up 16% from last year; lower than I expected since I lost the 5% discount for a claims free history. In the previous year, my premium had decreased by 10% for no reason that I could fathom. When I switched to Johnson from Cooperators, I saved more than 20%. I am still paying less than Cooperators wanted to charge me on renewal in 2004.

Pickles wrote:Just got my renewal notice. $712 plus tax (total $769 but aren't we supposed to be paying hst not just pst on Ontario policies? Better not ask...) for $283,000 building costs, $240,000 personal possessions (!) plus the $2 mill liability and sewer back up.
Coverage up 15%, premium up 12.6% from last year. Just over $2.51 per thousand of coverage (down a wee smidgen from last year's $2.56).

So a 1000 sq. ft. home could be replaced for $2920?$2.92 per square foot

The only consideration regarding an increase in premiums should be inflation in the past year that would increase the cost of re-building your property if it burns to the ground. You do not need insurance for the land. If there were no renovations the inflation adjustment of 15% seems rather high.Pickles wrote:Coverage up 15%, premium up 12.6% from last year. Just over $2.51 per thousand of coverage (down a wee smidgen from last year's $2.56).

I agree that $200K - 225K should be sufficient to rebuild but, in Toronto, you never know. I also see that I should have deducted the $50 premium for sewer protection from the $712 before calculating the charge per $1000 of coverage. That figure is now reduced to $2.33, less than last year. I think I'm still way ahead in cost and service than if I had remained with Cooperators. I think next year I'm eligible for the claims-free 5% discount again so I'm inclined to let the rich assessment of replacement cost go for this year.northbeach wrote:ISTM a 1000 square foot home should cost less than 200K to build, so a reasonable premium might be 200 x $2.50 = $500.00, where the 2.50 per 1000 rate has been determined appropriate earlier in this discussion thread.

Return to Property: Owning, Renting, Managing, Investing and Mortgaging
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest