Whoever coded that popover ad should be banished to Hell to spend the rest of eternity untangling Fortran spaghetti loops.Taggart wrote:The J. Lo marriage market
Whoever coded that popover ad should be banished to Hell to spend the rest of eternity untangling Fortran spaghetti loops.Taggart wrote:The J. Lo marriage market

Shakespeare wrote:Whoever coded that popover ad should be banished to Hell to spend the rest of eternity untangling Fortran spaghetti loops.Taggart wrote:The J. Lo marriage market



Stocks go up and down, but eventually, most go up. So if you invest and hold on, odds are you'll do quite well. As my former Princeton economics professor, Burton Malkiel, told me, "The stock market is like a gambling casino with the odds in your favor. Over the long pull, it beats inflation, and beats it by a great deal."
If you want to beat other investors, too, it's logical to think that you should turn to the most visible specialists for advice. These men and women make their living studying stocks, and they sound so confident on CNBC. You'd think they could beat the market.
Don't bet on it...







WishingWealth wrote:Taggart: Clements is a good read albeit too often a bit depressing.
But he is probably not read by the very people who would need to follow his advise.
On the other hand, I like the more balanced approach of Scott Burns which could be summed up by the anon. quote:
'To live poor and die poor is a tradedy but to live poor and die rich is an insanity.'
WW




"Brokerage firms want the freedom to disguise their brokers as financial advisors," he writes. Hedge funds "want the freedom to charge you ridiculous sums of money in return for mediocre performance and no accountability, and the freedom to turn the markets upside down whenever they goof up." And mutual funds "want the freedom to skim off billions of dollars in fees for doing a consistently lousy job of managing your money." Weiss lays it all out, citing studies by respected academics that show the miserable job the pros do for their high-ticket fees. Everybody wants a free market when it helps their cause. So it goes for Wall Street. Investors aren't so lucky.


Taggart wrote:Question. As of December 30, 2005, Switzerland had a weight of 6.9% in EAFE. Since when did it become an emerging market?

Cramer wrote:"The ETF theory keeps coming back to haunt me. Brazil, Switzerland, South Korea and India all got hammered more than most emerging markets."

Shakespeare wrote:I think Taggart's point is that it should not be included in Cramer's list:Cramer wrote:"The ETF theory keeps coming back to haunt me. Brazil, Switzerland, South Korea and India all got hammered more than most emerging markets."



Return to Financial News, Policy and Economics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest