Real Return Bonds

Discuss your favourite picks, broker, and trading or investment style.

Postby ghariton » 26Sep2005 07:54

Feeonly.ca wrote:
Hmmm.... most of the links don't seem to work.


Hi Georges,

I'm still here and still holding my stripped RRBs.

AFAIK, the "public area" links on the web site work just fine.


Gosh, Ellis, I hadn't recognized you. Still, I should have figured it out from the profile to which Shakespeare linked.

Nice to know you're here.

Georges
The plural of anecdote is NOT data.
User avatar
ghariton
Gold Ring
Gold Ring
 
Posts: 4982
Joined: 18Feb2005 19:59
Location: Ottawa

Postby ghariton » 18Oct2005 09:44

ghariton wrote:Yield on the 2021 is down marginally to 1.64%, according to today's Globe and Mail.


Up marginally to 1.47%, according to today's Globe & Mail.

My wife retired last month and just got her lump-sum severance. Now what?

Georges
The plural of anecdote is NOT data.
User avatar
ghariton
Gold Ring
Gold Ring
 
Posts: 4982
Joined: 18Feb2005 19:59
Location: Ottawa

Postby Feeonly.ca » 18Oct2005 11:36

My wife retired last month and just got her lump-sum severance. Now what?

Hi Georges,

You don't normally get "severance" when you retire. What was the circumstance?
Planning Pays Dividends
User avatar
Feeonly.ca
Silver Ring
Silver Ring
 
Posts: 351
Joined: 23Feb2005 11:25
Location: British Columbia

Postby Shakespeare » 18Oct2005 11:43

If she worked for the government, you do indeed get a lump-sum payment when you retire - I got $12K.

($500K settlements weren't available at my level. :( )
“I've been free a parcel of years now and I predict you will find it looser but not always more comfortable.” -- R.A. Heinlein, Citizen of the Galaxy.
User avatar
Shakespeare
Diamond Ring
Diamond Ring
 
Posts: 12378
Joined: 16Feb2005 00:25
Location: Lethbridge, AB

Postby ghariton » 18Oct2005 11:46

Feeonly.ca wrote:My wife retired last month and just got her lump-sum severance. Now what?

Hi Georges,

You don't normally get "severance" when you retire. What was the circumstance?


I may have used the wrong word -- it may be a retiring allowance. When a public servant retires from the federal public service, he or she gets, in addition to an ongoing pension, a lump-sum payment equal to one week's pay for each year's service (except for the first year of service, which entitles you to two weeks' pay). Most of it can be rolled into an RRSP, using the usual rules.

In my wife's case, she has 16 years' service. (She stayed home with the kids and worked on contract for many years.)

Georges
The plural of anecdote is NOT data.
User avatar
ghariton
Gold Ring
Gold Ring
 
Posts: 4982
Joined: 18Feb2005 19:59
Location: Ottawa

Postby Shakespeare » 18Oct2005 11:48

it may be a retiring allowance
I believe that is the correct designation.
“I've been free a parcel of years now and I predict you will find it looser but not always more comfortable.” -- R.A. Heinlein, Citizen of the Galaxy.
User avatar
Shakespeare
Diamond Ring
Diamond Ring
 
Posts: 12378
Joined: 16Feb2005 00:25
Location: Lethbridge, AB

Postby Bylo Selhi » 18Oct2005 12:19

ghariton wrote:Most of it can be rolled into an RRSP, using the usual rules.

In my wife's case, she has 16 years' service.

The rules have changed over the years with higher RRSP limits in earlier years. From CRA:
A retiring allowance rollover can be transferred to a registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) to defer tax. This is in addition to the normal limits for RRSP contributions. A portion of a retiring allowance may be transferred to an RRSP. An individual may transfer up to $2,000 for each year of service before 1996 plus up to $1,500 for each year of service before 1989 in which no pension or deferred profit-sharing plan benefits were earned. The 1995 budget eliminated the rollover for years of service after 1995 given the maturation of pension plans and the ability to carry forward unused RRSP limits.

BTW this doesn't apply just to civil servants or retirees. Anyone who leaves a job where they were employed prior to 1996 can apply a lump sum of employment income, be it unused vacation days, credit for overtime or sick days not used, etc. to their RRSP tax-free. Make sure the employer designates the payment as a retiring allowance and that the money goes straight into the RRSP in order to avoid withholding taxes. (There's a designation on the T-4 too IIRC.)
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Diamond Ring
Diamond Ring
 
Posts: 15499
Joined: 16Feb2005 11:36
Location: Waterloo, ON

Postby Gus » 18Oct2005 16:09

I was given a severance package this year, which I am hardly able to shelter at all. My employer had a defined benefit scheme and the 2004 contributions triggered a Pension Adjustment that leaves me with very little contribution room in 2005. To add insult to injury, there were no contributions made to my DB pension in 2005, since I was let go in early January. So, this year, which may be the last ever when I am in the top marginal tax bracket, is one year when I can shelter no income. I joined the company in 1998, so no rollovers are allowed.

I think I'm SOOL on this one.
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us. — Jerry Garcia
User avatar
Gus
Gold Ring
Gold Ring
 
Posts: 2268
Joined: 11Mar2005 14:01
Location: Salt Spring Island, BC

Postby Ken » 20Oct2005 22:35

Gus wrote:I was given a severance package this year, which I am hardly able to shelter at all. My employer had a defined benefit scheme and the 2004 contributions triggered a Pension Adjustment that leaves me with very little contribution room in 2005. To add insult to injury, there were no contributions made to my DB pension in 2005, since I was let go in early January. So, this year, which may be the last ever when I am in the top marginal tax bracket, is one year when I can shelter no income. I joined the company in 1998, so no rollovers are allowed.

I think I'm SOOL on this one.

I believe that retirement allowances, up to $2000 per year (an old number which may have changed), might be treated separately from your current RRSP room. But since the last time I had one was about 15 years ago, I could be out to lunch. However, since I work in payroll (on the programming side, not the business side), I do at least know that companies regularly provide lump-sum payments and call them "retirement allowance". Presumably this is because there is a tax advantage to doing so.
Ken
I'd rather be fishing than checking my stocks
User avatar
Ken
Silver Ring
Silver Ring
 
Posts: 135
Joined: 03Jul2005 14:14
Location: Calgary

Postby scomac » 20Oct2005 23:04

Ken wrote:I believe that retirement allowances, up to $2000 per year (an old number which may have changed), might be treated separately from your current RRSP room.


This topic was discussed in the past couple of sessions of the Investment Planning course I'm currently taking. I don't have any specific notes as it was more of a tangenital discussion. IIRC the instructor indicated that a severance package or retirement allowance could be rolled directly into an RRSP regardless of whether there is contribution room or not. He didn't indicate that there was any cap on the amount that could be rolled in.

Hopefully someone (Norbert?) familiar with the rules will clarify this.

Scott
"On what principle is it, that when we see nothing but improvement behind us, we are to expect nothing but deterioration before us?"
Thomas Babington Macaulay in 1830
User avatar
scomac
Gold Ring
Gold Ring
 
Posts: 3997
Joined: 19Feb2005 10:47
Location: The Greenbelt

Postby Bylo Selhi » 20Oct2005 23:07

Ken wrote:
Gus wrote:I was given a severance package this year, which I am hardly able to shelter at all. My employer had a defined benefit scheme and the 2004 contributions triggered a Pension Adjustment that leaves me with very little contribution room in 2005. To add insult to injury, there were no contributions made to my DB pension in 2005, since I was let go in early January. So, this year, which may be the last ever when I am in the top marginal tax bracket, is one year when I can shelter no income. I joined the company in 1998, so no rollovers are allowed.

I think I'm SOOL on this one.

I believe that retirement allowances, up to $2000 per year (an old number which may have changed), might be treated separately from your current RRSP room. But since the last time I had one was about 15 years ago, I could be out to lunch. However, since I work in payroll (on the programming side, not the business side), I do at least know that companies regularly provide lump-sum payments and call them "retirement allowance". Presumably this is because there is a tax advantage to doing so.

See my CRA quote three posts up, specifically "This is in addition to the normal limits for RRSP contributions."
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Diamond Ring
Diamond Ring
 
Posts: 15499
Joined: 16Feb2005 11:36
Location: Waterloo, ON

Postby scomac » 20Oct2005 23:49

Bylo Selhi wrote:See my CRA quote three posts up, specifically "This is in addition to the normal limits for RRSP contributions."


Dohhhh!!! :oops:
"On what principle is it, that when we see nothing but improvement behind us, we are to expect nothing but deterioration before us?"
Thomas Babington Macaulay in 1830
User avatar
scomac
Gold Ring
Gold Ring
 
Posts: 3997
Joined: 19Feb2005 10:47
Location: The Greenbelt

Postby Shakespeare » 20Oct2005 23:52

tangenital discussion
Dear, oh dear. I hope nobody er, overexposed and got sunburned. :roll: :roll: :roll:

:wink:
“I've been free a parcel of years now and I predict you will find it looser but not always more comfortable.” -- R.A. Heinlein, Citizen of the Galaxy.
User avatar
Shakespeare
Diamond Ring
Diamond Ring
 
Posts: 12378
Joined: 16Feb2005 00:25
Location: Lethbridge, AB

Postby Bylo Selhi » 02Nov2005 12:21

Anybody know about these puppies? Province Of Ontario Real Return Bonds [PDF]

According to this they were launched on 28Sep05 but they're not listed here. Did the ship go aground?
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Diamond Ring
Diamond Ring
 
Posts: 15499
Joined: 16Feb2005 11:36
Location: Waterloo, ON

Postby Feeonly.ca » 02Nov2005 13:05

Yup, I posted about them on Sept 30th. (see below)



Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 11:46 am
Post subject: Ontario issues RRB's

-------------------

It's nice to see some more RRB selection, albeit a small offering.

I'm not sure if the Ontario 1.93% is the coupon or the effective real yield.

The 30 year Bank of Canada RRB is currently priced for a real yield of ~1.65%.

From todays Globe & Mail:

Friday, September 30, 2005

Ontario bond sale proves popular

Ontario got a warm reception for its first issue of inflation-linked bonds.

The province sold 30-year debt this week that offered a 1.93-per-cent annual interest rate, plus inflation, as expressed by the Consumer Price Index. Ontario planned to sell at least $250-million of bonds, and was able to bump the offering up to $700-million in the face of strong demand from institutional investors. Pension funds and insurers that must pay retirees inflation-linked benefits were the primary buyers. RBC Dominion Securities Inc. led the sale. Staff

_________________
Planning Pays Dividends
Planning Pays Dividends
User avatar
Feeonly.ca
Silver Ring
Silver Ring
 
Posts: 351
Joined: 23Feb2005 11:25
Location: British Columbia

Postby ghariton » 02Nov2005 17:21

What's a good online source for the yield on various TIPS?

(I'm tired of telephoning TD, and they're probably tired of me doing it.)

Thanks

Georges
The plural of anecdote is NOT data.
User avatar
ghariton
Gold Ring
Gold Ring
 
Posts: 4982
Joined: 18Feb2005 19:59
Location: Ottawa

Postby Bylo Selhi » 02Nov2005 17:29

ghariton wrote:What's a good online source for the yield on various TIPS?

TIPS or RRBs? The former (from the horse's mouth): Bloomberg

For RRBs, any edition of the G&M. Online, start here and look for the item "CANADIAN BONDS." (The URL changes daily so I can't provide a general link.)

Feeonly.ca wrote:Yup, I posted about them on Sept 30th.

Yeah, I know. But why aren't they listed on the Gov ON website or on the G&M's bond page? Is this another private placement a la Hwy407 RRBs?
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Diamond Ring
Diamond Ring
 
Posts: 15499
Joined: 16Feb2005 11:36
Location: Waterloo, ON

Postby Feeonly.ca » 02Nov2005 17:57

But why aren't they listed on the Gov ON website or on the G&M's bond page? Is this another private placement a la Hwy407 RRBs?


It was a tiny offering and likely presold. I don't think the Globe reports pricing for the Quebec RRB's so I very much doubt these will be covered.

Someone may have even approached the Ontario Govt with a specific offer. I would be interested to know if this is a one off or is this part of a new ongoing program.
Planning Pays Dividends
User avatar
Feeonly.ca
Silver Ring
Silver Ring
 
Posts: 351
Joined: 23Feb2005 11:25
Location: British Columbia

Postby ghariton » 02Nov2005 22:49

Bylo Selhi wrote:(from the horse's mouth): Bloomberg


Thanks, Bylo. I should have known :oops:

Georges
The plural of anecdote is NOT data.
User avatar
ghariton
Gold Ring
Gold Ring
 
Posts: 4982
Joined: 18Feb2005 19:59
Location: Ottawa

Postby Shakespeare » 02Nov2005 23:01

There's also TIP.
“I've been free a parcel of years now and I predict you will find it looser but not always more comfortable.” -- R.A. Heinlein, Citizen of the Galaxy.
User avatar
Shakespeare
Diamond Ring
Diamond Ring
 
Posts: 12378
Joined: 16Feb2005 00:25
Location: Lethbridge, AB

Postby Bylo Selhi » 06Nov2005 15:31

Only available in Britain? Pity! :(

iShares € Inflation Linked Bond ETF [PDF] "gives investors exposure to the performance of the euro zone government inflation linked bond market."
Barclays' lawyer wrote:The Company has not been, nor will it be, qualified for distribution to the public in Canada as no prospectus for the Company has been filed with any securities commission or regulatory authority in Canada or any province or territory thereof. This document is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed, as an advertisement, or any other step in furtherance of a public offering of shares in Canada. No person resident in Canada for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) may purchase or accept a transfer of shares in the Company unless he or she is eligible to do so under applicable Canadian or provincial laws.


BTW, according to this, other new FTSE-listed ETFs include, inter alia:
iShares DJ Euro STOXX Select Dividend: Like the DVY in the U.S., only for Europe – this fund tracks the 30 highest yielding equities in the Eurozone, relative to their home market.
iShares FTSE/EPRA European Property Index Fund: This fund invests in real estate and property companies in ten European countries, with a heavy weighting in Holland and France.
iShares FTSE UK Dividend Plus: The high-yield fund tracks the 50 highest yielding equities in the Eurozone UK, with stocks selected from the FTSE 350 Index. The historic yield on this fund is an impressive five percent.
Also, "BGI plans to roll the new funds out across Europe over time" though presumably our regulators will "protect" us from those as well.
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Diamond Ring
Diamond Ring
 
Posts: 15499
Joined: 16Feb2005 11:36
Location: Waterloo, ON

Postby Feeonly.ca » 06Nov2005 16:05

Dispite the caveat above you should be able to purchase any publicly traded FTSE-listed stock or ETF via your broker provided they have a reciprical relationship with a UK broker.

Sometime back RBC Action Direct was able to quote me in this fashion on actual OAT€i's, the Euro-denominated inflation-indexed bonds.

There would be double commision(s) involved to buy and to sell.
Planning Pays Dividends
User avatar
Feeonly.ca
Silver Ring
Silver Ring
 
Posts: 351
Joined: 23Feb2005 11:25
Location: British Columbia

Postby Bylo Selhi » 06Nov2005 20:43

Feeonly.ca wrote:Dispite the caveat above you should be able to purchase any publicly traded FTSE-listed stock or ETF via your broker provided they have a reciprical relationship with a UK broker.
That's interesting, especially in light of "No person resident in Canada for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) may purchase or accept a transfer of shares in the Company unless he or she is eligible to do so under applicable Canadian or provincial laws." Remember the furor over changes to ITA with respect to NRTs and FIEs? Perhaps this is a veiled warning that these ETFs aren't exempt like US-listed ETFs and investors may be required to mark them to market for tax purposes. (Although strictly speaking the wording says they're illegal, not just taxed egregiously.)
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Diamond Ring
Diamond Ring
 
Posts: 15499
Joined: 16Feb2005 11:36
Location: Waterloo, ON

Postby CalgaryGuy » 06Nov2005 21:05

Bylo Selhi wrote:
Feeonly.ca wrote:Dispite the caveat above you should be able to purchase any publicly traded FTSE-listed stock or ETF via your broker provided they have a reciprical relationship with a UK broker.


That's interesting, especially in light of "No person resident in Canada for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) may purchase or accept a transfer of shares in the Company unless he or she is eligible to do so under applicable Canadian or provincial laws." Remember the furor over changes to ITA with respect to NRTs and FIEs? Perhaps this is a veiled warning that these ETFs aren't exempt like US-listed ETFs and investors may be required to mark them to market for tax purposes. (Although strictly speaking the wording says they're illegal, not just taxed egregiously.)


Is this an issue with these etfs or or all foreign shares? It can't be taboo to own the foreign shares. You can hold shares from the following exchanges in your rrsp:

Prescribed stock exchanges outside Canada
in Australia, the Australian Stock Exchange
in Spain, the Madrid Stock Exchange
in Austria, the Vienna Stock Exchange
in Sweden, the Stockholm Stock Exchange
in Belgium, the Brussels Stock Exchange
in Switzerland, the Zurich Stock Exchange
in France, the Paris Stock Exchange
in the United Kingdom, the London Stock Exchange

...list goes on full list in this doc:
http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/E/pub/tp/it320r3/it320r3-e.pdf

I checked out hsbcdirect. They appear let you buy shares on the ftse .
Its a 55 Euro commission (min) plus a 50 euro "levee" . So minimum cost of 105 euros. pretty steep.
CalgaryGuy
Bronze Ring
Bronze Ring
 
Posts: 14
Joined: 11Mar2005 19:16

Postby Shakespeare » 06Nov2005 21:11

If they [iShares € Inflation Linked Bond ETF] were held in an RRSP "mark-to-market" rules, if applicable, would be irrelevant.

Provided they could be held in an RRSP, of course.
“I've been free a parcel of years now and I predict you will find it looser but not always more comfortable.” -- R.A. Heinlein, Citizen of the Galaxy.
User avatar
Shakespeare
Diamond Ring
Diamond Ring
 
Posts: 12378
Joined: 16Feb2005 00:25
Location: Lethbridge, AB

PreviousNext

Return to Stocks, Bonds, ETFs, Funds, REITS and More

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests